
social.group.members
Marriage is half our Deen 🤲 From wedding planning to relationship and marriage advice, share all your marriage related experiences here with our friendly community ❤️
Avoid been despirate please 🙏
The right man or woman will never stress you
He won't waste your time
So if you see red flags run for your life📌
And be prayerful
May My Lord, the Answerer of the distressed when he calls upon Him make us choose the right spouse.
So if I wanna like back I need to subscribe?
لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا ٱللَّٰهُ مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ ٱللَّٰهِ
اَللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلٰى سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلٰى اٰلِ سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ
Assalamualaikum...
Bismillahirrahmanirrahim...
🗣️🗣️🤔The JAMAA app allows followers of Ghulam Ahmad to join. What are the risks for inter-sect marriages if they don't state their identity in their bio? And one of the candidates is trapped. Is JAMAA's stance acceptable under international law?
Hiding an Ahmadi identity on a Muslim matchmaking or social app creates severe legal, theological, and physical safety risks, while international law firmly protects an individual's right to marry and exit religious groups freely.
Followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (known as Ahmadis) face deep systemic opposition from mainstream Sunni and Shia Muslims, who view their beliefs as heretical. On an open Muslim social and matchmaking platform like the Jamaa App, concealing this identity to enter into an inter-sect marriage introduces acute complications, especially if a candidate becomes "trapped" due to local state laws or family coercion.
Risks of Concealing Ahmadi Identity in Inter-Sect Marriages
Omitting an Ahmadi identity when interacting with non-Ahmadi Muslims on platforms like Jamaa presents immediate structural and personal threats:
Legal Invalidation (Void Marriage): In countries operating under strict Islamic family law (e.g., Pakistan, Malaysia), an Ahmadi marrying a mainstream Muslim without full disclosure is legally catastrophic. Because mainstream Islamic jurisprudence classifies Ahmadis as non-Muslims, family courts will rule the marriage completely void (Batil) on grounds of religious incompatibility.
Criminal Charges & Fraud Prosecution: If a spouse discovers their partner's Ahmadi faith post-marriage, they can file criminal charges for fraud, impersonation, or deception. In strict jurisdictions, this can trigger state-level prosecution for blasphemy or violating anti-Ahmadi ordinances.
Theological Excommunication: The official Ahmadiyya administration (the Jama'at) enforces strict endogamy rules. An Ahmadi who marries outside the community without explicit administrative approval faces institutional penalties, including being cut off from community networks and losing the right to have an Ahmadi Imam conduct their Nikah (wedding contract).
Physical Safety and Vigilantism: Revealing an Ahmadi identity late into a relationship or marriage carries a high risk of violent retaliation from the spouse’s family or community, particularly in regions where anti-Ahmadi sentiment is high.
If a Candidate is Trapped: The Legal Reality
When a user becomes "trapped"—whether through forced marriage, physical confinement by family, or legal deadlock in a country that criminalizes their faith—the conflict between local religious laws and international standards becomes acute.
What International Law Says
International human rights treaties universally reject forced marriages and religious coercion.
The Right to Choose a Spouse: Article 16 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) explicitly states that full-age adults have the right to marry "without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion" and that marriage requires "free and full consent."
Freedom of Belief and Apostasy: Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) guarantees the freedom to adopt, change, or manifest one's religion.
Under these frameworks, forcing a person to remain in a marriage under false pretenses, punishing them for their sect, or trapping them via state/familial mechanisms constitutes a gross violation of international human rights law.
Is Jamaa's Stance Acceptable Under International Law?
The Jamaa platform is developed by Muzz Ltd, a UK-based commercial entity bound by Western digital regulations.
Platform Policy vs. State Law: As a private digital network, Jamaa promotes "freedom of speech on important topics within the Muslim community". If the platform permits Ahmadi members to join but advises or enforces strict disclosure, it complies with international standards by attempting to protect users from deceptive contracts and subsequent local violence.
Duty of Care: However, if a user is actively trapped or facing immediate threat, international human rights principles dictate that the platform must provide a mechanism to report danger, hide location data, and cooperate with international human rights organizations or legal counsels to safeguard the individual.
If you or someone you know is currently in danger or trapped due to a religious or marital dispute, please reach out immediately to international aid organizations such as Human Rights Watch or local secular legal aid societies that specialize in religious asylum and forced marriage extraction.
To help provide more specific guidance, could you share:
The geographic location or country where the candidate is currently trapped?
Whether the threat is primarily coming from family members or local state authorities?
If the individual needs immediate access to emergency emergency support or asylum resources?
https://share.google/aimode/NPnAWgCjHBS1SPF4c
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🗣️🗣️Is the attitude of tolerance of JAMAA or MUZZ towards Ghulam Ahmad's followers who join the application solely to implement religious tolerance as described in QS 109: 6? Can Muzz guarantee that Ghulam Ahmad's followers write honestly that they are Ahmadiyah sect in Muzz's marriage profile and JAMAA bio?
🗣️🗣️Neither MUZZ nor JAMAA can guarantee that individuals honestly disclose their sect, as neither performs background theology verification for every profile. Furthermore, orthodox and mainstream Islamic institutions do not share the belief that Ahmadiyah represents an Islamic sect, making profile verification extremely complex.
Application Policies and "Tolerance"
Theological Stances: Mainstream Islamic jurisprudence considers the Ahmadiyya movement heretical due to their belief in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a prophet. As a result, both orthodox Muslim communities and religious councils do not recognize Ahmadis as members of the traditional Islamic faith.
Platform Application Guidelines: Both JAMAA and MUZZ function as community platforms for Muslims seeking friends, networking, and marriage. While they encourage mutual respect, their guidelines do not equate to accepting Ahmadiyah interpretations as valid mainstream Islam. The principle of "religious tolerance" is governed by the platforms' standard codes of conduct (such as banning abusive behavior) rather than theological agreement.
Profile Verification Limitations
Self-Reporting System: Both MUZZ and JAMAA rely entirely on user self-reporting. Users check boxes defining their sect, but the platforms do not conduct background checks or require religious certificates to verify sectarian identity.
Lack of Guarantee: Neither app can guarantee that followers of Ghulam Ahmad—or any other sect—will write honestly that they are Ahmadi in their marriage profiles or public bios. Users have total control over what they display to the public.
If you are considering how sect representation impacts the matchmaking process, would you like me to detail:
How MUZZ manages sect filters and matching preferences?
How JAMAA handles community reporting and profile guidelines?
This sums up the modern women I guess
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1JCB74sf9U/?mibextid=wwXIfr
I have good looking fit successful younger brothers that cook for themselves and our family, are loyal to one girl, and cant help but compare them to the disappointing boring , promiscuous guys on the apps who let themselves go and are not as ambitious. I can’t believe men can let themselves be this mediocre when i live with amazing funny guys every single day. Anyone else run into this issue where their family has indirectly made the bar too high?