Group Hero

All things marriage

social.group.members

Marriage is half our Deen 🤲 From wedding planning to relationship and marriage advice, share all your marriage related experiences here with our friendly community ❤️

Share group
Fatima

@FatimabintAdam

6 days ago

Controversial post;

Would you take a lie detector test? Why? Why not?

My answer is yes. I have nothing to hide and I don’t see any issues with it.

social.contentViewer.likes
55
Share
Qutaiba

@Qu7080

6 days ago

Good morning friends 🤍

social.contentViewer.likes
5
Share
Norah Nor

@Syjjaa2988

6 days ago

Morning❤️

social.contentViewer.likes
3
Share
Amine

@amine16097886

6 days ago

Hi 👋

Share
Rullyana

@Rullyana

6 days ago

Newbi....👋

1
Share
Junaed Ahmed

@Witness_ME

6 days ago

Is it possible for someone who exhibits arrogance to also hold love in their heart? I have observed individuals using loyal and motivational language, along with gentle communication, yet their actions suggest they are not seeking a partner who aligns with Halal principles, but rather conventionally attractive individuals.

2
Share
Alaa-dine

@Alaa34016975

6 days ago

Hi

Share
Samar Abouzaied

@samar_7

6 days ago

If you want to play go find another app

social.contentViewer.likes
Share
Faris Ahmed

@farisahmed989994

6 days ago

I saw the posts of a woman saying a lot of things about men, and then I read her bio, "Psychology graduate and philosophy enthusiast." Ironically, the posts reflected more confirmation bias than psychology and more ideology than philosophy.

The entire argument boils down to one belief. Women are the prize, men must prove themselves, men owe everything, women owe nothing. That's not equality. That's entitlement.

You say men are shallow for wanting beauty, youth, femininity, or peace. But when women want money, status, security, height, confidence, ambition, and financial stability, suddenly it's called "having standards." Either both genders are allowed preferences, or neither is. Logic doesn't change depending on who is speaking.

You say men have nothing to offer except money, but then insist every woman should prioritize a rich, financially stable man. If money is all men offer, why is it the first thing you tell women to look for? You can't call men ATMs while expecting ATM-level financial performance.

You argue pregnancy changes a woman's body forever. That's true. But you conveniently ignore that many men spend decades sacrificing their health, peace of mind, and time to provide for their families. Different sacrifices don't make one gender more valuable than the other.

You call men "labor diggers" because they expect cooperation in marriage, yet many women openly expect men to pay for dates, weddings, homes, bills, emergencies, and children. If expecting provision isn't exploitation, then expecting partnership isn't slavery.

A philosophy enthusiast should know that judging an entire gender by its worst examples is intellectually lazy. A psychology graduate should know that generalization, emotional reasoning, and confirmation bias are cognitive errors, not evidence.

Not every man is a manipulator. Not every woman is a victim.

Weak men blame women.
Bitter women blame men.
Mature adults take responsibility for themselves.

The biggest contradiction is calling yourself a feminist who believes in equality while repeatedly declaring that women are "the prize." Equality doesn't place one gender above the other. If one side is the prize, then the other side becomes the applicant. That isn't equality. It's superiority disguised as equality.

The truth is simple. A healthy relationship isn't built on "men owe everything" or "women are the prize." It's built on two people bringing value, respecting each other, and taking responsibility instead of blaming half the world's population for their frustrations.

Share