Politics

Now I understand why majority regular people don't discuss religion, because it not end well, supremacists... Will impose their version, not let you disagree, mock you.. eat your energy and time.. threat you after life consequences

Therefore china ccp... Not let them inside in their country...

He was booed for attending a sports game

Many fans weren't able to afford tickets to the first series home game, with the cheapest online resale tickets going for more than $10,000 (£7,500) and going up to more than $100,000.

Regular Knicks games already rank among the most expensive in the NBA.

"That's the way life goes," Trump said on Friday when asked about the extreme prices. "It's sort

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czj89mz3mzzo

https://youtu.be/7JkMUvDrcPQ?si=2xuV9iNdF2Rpu6qv
A lot of jealous Sunni Leaders talk garbage about Iran 🇮🇷 and curse it instead of isra-ill but when was the last time you prayed for Martyrdom and Allah granted you that ? I’m a Sunni and I forever stand with Iran 🇮🇷 yea it isn’t perfect show me which Muslim State is ? But salute 🫡 the courage and determination!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OqmoiUO4UDo&pp=ugUHEgVlbi1JTg%3D%3D&ra=m

Never thought I would see the day when a politician grows a backbone and speaks the truth about Israel. How long do you think it will be before he mysteriously dies?

This is insane!!

https://youtu.be/Kqoa07ql_to

https://youtube.com/watch?v=BTJGr78-zyw&si=O4OFdFzNUGidEjU4

Well formed structured rebuttal to the key objections too Tommy

1. Objection: "The numbers don't lie" (60% immigrant mothers in London, 78% foreign descent in Brussels).

· Rebuttal: The numbers are often misleading without context. "Immigrant mother" in London data often includes second-generation women (born in the UK) who have a foreign-born parent. Furthermore, Brussels' statistics are inflated by its role as an EU capital (diplomats, NGO workers) and its unique history. More importantly, correlation does not equal causation. High immigrant birth rates are a symptom of aging native populations and low domestic birth rates (below replacement level). The "problem" is demography, not immigration.

2. Objection: "Mass immigration is an intentional agenda by the far-left/establishment to break down identity."

· Rebuttal: This is a conspiracy fallacy (assuming intent without evidence). The primary driver of immigration in the West is economic demand (cheap labor for agriculture, construction, care homes) and aging workforces, not a cabal. Capitalist corporations (often right-leaning) push for labor mobility. The "far-left" generally opposes neoliberal open-border policies. You cannot blame both "globalist corporations" and "Marxists" for the same policy, as they are ideological opposites.

3. Objection: "Muslims do not integrate; they stay separate (school playgrounds, no mixed friend groups)."

· Rebuttal: This confuses self-segregation due to racism with religious choice. In Luton, studies show that Muslim parents often keep children separate because non-Muslim children bully them for their faith or race. The "white flight" Robinson describes—where English families move out when Muslims move in—is also a form of non-integration. Integration is a two-way street. Furthermore, data shows second/third-generation Muslims have higher English proficiency and intermarriage rates than first-generation, directly contradicting the "never integrate" claim.

4. Objection: "Quran 5:51 forbids friendships with Christians/Jews, causing grooming gangs and hostility."

· Rebuttal: This is scriptural cherry-picking. The verse refers to taking political allies against the Muslim community in a state of war (context of 7th-century Medina), not social friendship. The overwhelming majority of British Muslims have non-Muslim friends, work colleagues, and neighbors. The grooming gangs (Rotherham, Telford) were a horrific crime, but government inquiries (Prof. Alexis Jay) found the primary cause was institutional failure (police feared being called racist), not a systematic Quranic mandate. 90%+ of convicted groomers were not "devout" but opportunistic criminals.

5. Objection: "Two-tier policing" (police arrest white patriots but not pro-Palestinian protesters or Muslim criminals).

· Rebuttal: Data disproves this. In 2023/24, UK police arrested more far-right protesters than Islamist protesters, but only because far-right marches (like the "Unite the Kingdom" rally) had higher rates of public order offenses (throwing bottles, racial aggravation). The pro-Palestinian marches involved over 1 million attendees; the arrest rate was lower per capita because they were overwhelmingly peaceful. The Henry Vincent case mentioned is misleading: the police handcuffed the white victim initially to treat his stab wounds (standard triage) before arresting the attackers.

6. Objection: "40,000 Muslims on a terror watch list; Islam causes violence."

· Rebuttal: That figure is the total number of individuals referred to Prevent (a counter-extremism program), not convicted terrorists. A referral can be for anything from sharing a video to saying a phrase online. Furthermore, the vast majority of terror plots in the UK (by conviction rate) are from far-right white nationalists (Darren Osborne, Thomas Mair) and Irish republicans, not Islamists. In 2023, MI5 reported that Islamist plots were at their lowest proportion in a decade.

7. Objection: "Muslims are a burden on the state/benefits (Somali 90% on benefits)."

· Rebuttal: The Somali statistic (often from Minnesota) is decontextualized. Refugees and asylum seekers are legally not allowed to work for the first 6-12 months, forcing them into benefits. After integration and language training, second-generation Somalis have employment rates approaching the national average. Furthermore, studies (Oxford Migration Observatory) show that European Muslims pay more in VAT and council tax as a percentage of their income than the average native, due to lower tax avoidance.

8. Objection: "We need to 'encourage' (pay) non-integrated Muslims to leave."

· Rebuttal: This is ethnic cleansing by financial incentive. It is a human rights violation under the 4th Geneva Convention (forcible transfer of populations). If applied, it would set a precedent that any group the government deems "non-integrated" (Sikhs, Jews, atheists) could be legally bought out. Furthermore, it is logistically impossible: You cannot prove "lack of integration" legally, and you cannot strip citizenship from natural-born British Muslims, who are as native as Robinson.

9. Objection: "Christians reformed; Islam cannot reform."

· Rebuttal: This ignores history. The Christian Reformation involved 150 years of wars that killed 8 million people (Thirty Years' War). Islam is currently in its own reformation, but it is only 50 years old. Moreover, the "UAE/Saudi reform" Robinson dismisses is actually a massive shift: Saudi Arabia has banned corporal punishment in schools, allowed women to drive, and opened a cinema. Indonesia (the largest Muslim nation) is a democracy with secular laws. Change is happening, but it requires time and lack of Western bombing.

10. Objection: "If a school gets massacred, that will be the tipping point for civil war."

· Rebuttal: This is a dangerous self-fulfilling prophecy. By publicly predicting that Islamists will attack a school and that this will justify mass violence/civil war, Robinson is providing a rhetorical blueprint for vigilantes. Furthermore, after the Manchester Arena bombing (22 dead), there was no civil war. After the Southport stabbings (July 2024), the result was not a war but the arrest of the far-right for rioting. British civil society is more resilient than this doomerism admits.

Summary Conclusion:
The video relies on anecdotal trauma (Robinson's cousin's rape), statistical misreading (terror watch lists), and motivational conspiracy (the establishment wants collapse). It ignores the actual data on integration, the fact that most rapes are intra-racial (white-on-white), and that violent crime has fallen 50% in the UK since 1995. The "tipping point" is not immigration—it is the reactionary violence that the speaker himself is stoking.

https://youtu.be/dHKgQtSABHM?si=OpYALfuAC9MlDsw3

Patrick got totally smacked by Mehdi. A must watch

https://www.youtube.com/live/DT3gimXBzAI?si=UBkK8MVjm7BsRmam

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/c8x2e8vezeqo

Where do yah Politically stand??
That's a tricky question I have learned to masterfully avoid. That's itself an answer.😅
"I stand with the right," I'll say. Yeh.

Right wing, you assume?? I guess.
It's Wrong, and that's the joke.
What I mean is simpler and more honest:
when something goes wrong, you'll find me standing with what's actually correct. Not ideology. Correctness.
The uncomfortable truth? huh.
Most people think they do this.
They confuse loyalty to a tribe with loyalty to reality.
They've outsourced their judgment to a flag, a slogan, a color.

I'm not interested in that bargain.
So yes, I'm "political". But not in the way your partisan intuition expects.

I'm politically engaged the way a surgeon is: by paying attention to what works, what heals, what kills. The aesthetics of your campaign matter less to me than the geometry of your argument.

Confused? Good. That means you're thinking. xd.